Saturday, January 23, 2016

A511.2.3.RB - Supportive Behavior


A511.2.3.RB - Supportive Behavior

Take the opportunity to reflect specifically on Yukl's material on pages 63 through 72, Supportive Behavior.

Assuming that these leadership behaviors are appropriate at all levels of organizations, do you use these behaviors in your work with others? Subordinates? If so, how are they effective in producing results? If not, could they be added to your personal repertoire of leadership behaviors?



Supportive behaviors include, “show[ing] consideration, acceptance, and concern for the needs and feelings of others.” (Yukl, 2013) As a leader, showing compassion for a subordinate can help earn trust and loyalty. Sincere efforts of supportive behavior will make gaining buy-in and support from your colleagues a lot easier. When a leader takes the time to build a relationship with a colleague or subordinate, suddenly that person is more than just a payroll number or generic “carbon-based” resource. Some of the ways that leaders can show support are, “showing acceptance and positive regard, [p]rovide sympathy and support when the person is anxious or upset, [b]olster the person’s self-esteem and confidence, [b]e willing to help with personal problems.” (Yukl, 2013) Treating the people you work with or who work for you as actual people with feelings and families is a huge step in gaining their cooperation and trust. In our Incident and Injury Free training classes, we like to say that a person doesn’t just leave all of their problems at the gate when they come to work. Each person is made up of their personal experiences and what that means to them at the moment. When a colleague blows up at you for apparently no reason at all, it’s possible that they are dealing with something that is extremely difficult and their anger actually has less to do with whatever you did and more about what they are working through internally. Understanding this and cultivating open and honest relationships with the people you work with is paramount to alleviating ambiguity and creating an encouraging work environment. I tend to have the mindset that a leader isn’t necessarily a manager so being supportive, isn’t a uniquely managerial behavior in my opinion.

Other behaviors of supportive leadership include mentorships and personal development. “The most basic principle of mentoring is to have a genuine concern about the personal development and career progress of subordinates.” (Yukl, 2013) It seems sad to think that this need emphasis, this genuine concern requirement, but it does. Attention from a manager and a subordinate is usually suspect until proven trustworthy. There are managers have used personal information and kept career advancement from people who have trusted them in order to advance their own careers or to exert power. (The same can be said about co-workers but let’s stay on this path.) When I first started at Boeing, I came across a blog by Dan Rockwell called, Leadership Freak. I get a daily dose of this and it is remarkable how common leadership issues are. One of the topics he tackled was intent, “Deluded leaders falsely believe intentions automatically translate into behaviors. You intend to be supportive so you must be supportive, right?” (Rockwell, 2013) This is where I find myself coming to when reading the pages on Supportive behaviors. This is a cynical take on it, but we all grew up with the saying about words vs. actions.
I think that I do use some of these supportive behaviors with my colleagues. I’m not a manager but I do work with a lot of college interns and train new hires. I’m not always the most patient person and I could do better at being a more positive example though. Back in 1993, I started working for Wal-Mart in San Antonio, TX. I was super excited and really wanted to be there. On my first day as I sat in the break room filling out new-hire paperwork, an employee came in, looked at what I was doing and made a comment about being new. I smiled at her and told her that it was my first day and that I was excited about it. She snarked, “You’ll get over it.” I was crushed. She completely icked my wow. (She was right but that’s not the point.) So fast forward to me working with interns and new hires at Boeing. I never want to do that to them. Heck, I’m still excited that I get to work at Boeing! So I try to be encouraging and sincerely helpful, at work and on a personal level; a lot of the new hires have just graduated from college and this is their first “real” job and are sometimes new to the area. I also work with them so that they understand not only what needs to be done but why it needs to be done. I want them to understand how they impact the factory systemically because that’s how I was taught and it made an impression on me. Sometimes knowing how what you do can help or hinder other people is very motivating. I’m not sure how to help new hires with their career goals but I do try to encourage them to take classes. I also encourage new hires to sit in on meetings and take notes, even if they have no idea what the meeting is about because exposure is the first step to understanding. I’m certainly not the only person who interacts with the interns and new hires but I don’t want to be the one who icked their wow. We have a couple of leads in our group that are really good at mentoring and career planning as well as being supportive. I try to learn from them and hopefully one day will emulate their behaviors when it’s my turn to be a lead.

This all being said and reflecting on the aspects of supportive behaviors in leadership, I think that if applied sincerely and with genuine advocacy for colleagues and subordinates, it is an effective leadership tool. Most people would like to be recognized as being important enough to encourage and support, mentor and promote whether by a superior or by a co-worker. Supportive behaviors remove the ego from management behaviors and allow managers to see what kind of impact they have on other people and for a lot of people, I think that could be humbling.



References:

Rockwell, D. (2013, January 14) Popping the Self-Delusion Bubble. https://leadershipfreak.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/popping-the-self-delusion-bubble/
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Sunday, January 17, 2016

A511.1.3.RB - Leadership vs. Management



The simple question "Why"? relates to cause and "Greater Goal."
Think about a leader who has inspired you. Was the person inspiring as an individual, or did you respond more to the cause to which the person enlisted you?

This week's module was very eye-opening to me. There has always been a gut feeling about leaders vs. managers and how one does not always equal the other but I couldn't necessarily define why I felt that. The TED video with Simon Sinek was very enlightening; you could apply his theory of "Why" to almost anything as a litmus test of why there was or was not success in the results. He kept saying, "People don't buy what you do but why you do it." I think that is going to be my mantra! I think that Sinek's statement is why I felt the way I did about certain leaders/managers. I didn't buy what they did and didn't know why they did what they did so I certainly didn't care to help them succeed, I put in my time and collected my paycheck and felt nothing at all. In my current position, I'm expected to follow processes that don't make sense and are not based in any logic that will benefit our organization. When I listen to our director speak, all I want to hear is the "why" but all I hear is the what and frankly, I don't care...because I don't know where it's coming from. I think my entire team could get on board if the director lowered his ego enough to share with us why he thinks these processes will work, why it is important to him. We'd at least give it a good try! Sinek also talked about authenticity in another video and it seemed to make sense that the authentic leader is going to share the why of the product/plan/whatever because he or she is passionate about it and believes so completely in it. The why and authenticity go hand in hand.

In our text, Yukl discusses the differences between managers and leaders. Managers "seek to produce predictability and order, whereas leading seeks to produce organizational change." (Yukl, 2013) Predictability and order is expected and does help when running a department or team but doesn't have to be an independent thing from wanting organizational change. If a director explained the why, he is exposing the systemic thinking behind his goals. Suddenly, everyone is looking ahead and thinking about what role they will have in making that change a reality. If predictability and order is needed to accomplish this why, then teams will work for those things as well. The what and the why have become a singular idea and people are energized because they get it. They see the whole picture and that (mostly) eliminates the apathy and drudgery of ambiguity.

Has there been an individual who inspired me? Was it the person or the cause? Eleanor Roosevelt has been an inspiration to me because of her dedication to human rights. As a First Lady, she could have been an advocate for many things but she chose human rights and was an activist her whole life. She was involved with FDR's New Deal, women's rights, civil liberties, the Works Progress Administration to name a few. As a woman, she was aristocratic and had famous relatives, but her causes endeared her to the common people. Her why was the people and her what included civil rights and jobs. She had an integral approach that included a lifetime of servant leadership that made people trust her. Eleanor Roosevelt inspires me to not forget about compassion and in this era, I feel like that is so very important.




Resources:
http://www.firstladies.org/biographies/firstladies.aspx?biography=33
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4ZoJKF_VuA&feature=share&list=PL42F8562DCD3CCEA8
Yukl, G. A. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.