A521.6.3.RB
- High Performance Teams
Based
on this week's readings from the Denning text, identify the elements of
high-performance teams and apply them to teams with whom you have worked in
your organization. Next, identify the importance of shared values and discuss
the influence of shared values on your team's performance. Finally, examine the
four patterns of working together and detail one positive and one negative
experience. What could you have done to influence the outcomes?
In my
experience, high performance teams have a special synergy. The team members
just seem to work well together and are able to collaborate without ego or
personal agendas. They work together to produce something that is beneficial to
everyone in the organization and because of these things, mostly resemble a
community. Shared experiences bring the people together in a way that is
powerful and creates an atmosphere of possibility.
The four
patterns of working together are: work groups, teams, communities, and
networks. (Denning, 2011) Work groups are generally those groups who are working
on the same project in the same space. This is the most common kind of group in
any organization. Work groups generally report to a common supervisor. When the
organization I was working for decided to come up with a “Transformation Team” –
this was a work group that consisted of people from different departments who
for a year all worked together on the same project and reported to a common
supervisor.
Teams are “organizational
groupings of people who are interdependent, share common goals, coordinate
their activities to accomplish these goals, and share responsibility for the
performance of the collectivity.” (Denning, 2011) In my organization, when we
are behind schedule or have an urgent project that needs immediate attention,
we usually have a “Tiger Team” of people who come from the impacted areas and
work together to solve the problem and prevent it from happening again. They
are dedicated to these teams until the solutions are found, tested,
implemented, and sustainable.
Communities are
a recent addition to the work patterns and refers to a group of people
basically share a common interest. “[C]ommunity meant a group of people in a
specific geographical area who lived, worked, played, worshipped, and died
together, sometimes over many generations.” (Denning, 2011) In my organization,
we have an inSite internal website that brings communities together within
Boeing. I belong to a few of these communities such as the Lean group, the Women
in Leadership group, and even the Group of Awesome. We share articles, ideas,
and even debates about things that we care a great deal about. We are not in
the same geographical location, usually, but we all come together for a common
interest.
Networks are
more dynamic because they are always being built on, maintained over time and
careers, and keep people connected in a mutually beneficial way. LinkedIn is a
networking site that can help connect people to find new careers, mentors, and
just connect with people in the same industry. It’s a place for recruiters to
search for candidates and for former co-workers to keep in touch. Networking
helps a lot in my organization because of its size. People come and go in a
very cyclical manner and it is always good to know people in other business
units who may be able to help solve issues for you and vice versa.
I was part of a
workshop, a Lean team, last year that yielded both a positive and a negative
experience. The positive experience was that I got to work with people I had
never really met before. It built up my network of people and exposed me to
some interesting aspects of the business of which I was previously only mildly
aware. I learned so much over the week and even got to build a scale model of
our process improvement using Legos and creativity. In my book, that is always
a good thing. The negative part was the Lean facilitator. His manager was well
known to all of us as just not a great manager. She would talk down to you one
second and then compliment your presentation in the next. She was
unpredictable, mean, and insincere. So I know he felt the pressure to get data
up to the stakeholders of this project and because of this, some things were
rushed, overlooked, and just wrong. We didn’t have all of the necessary people
on the team and when we brought that up we were told that it didn’t matter. Of
course it mattered! In the end, we were successful with coming up with an
alternative process that would actually save substantial time off the existing
process at a relatively low cost to the organization. I ended up taking a job
in South Carolina less than two weeks later so I’m not sure what ever happened
with the actually implementation.
References:
Denning, S. (2011). The Leader's Guide to Storytelling:
Mastering the Art and Discipline of Business Narrative. San Francisco, CA:
Jossey-Bass.
No comments:
Post a Comment