Sunday, April 23, 2017

A634.5.4.RB - Is Marketing Evil?

A634.5.4.RB - Is Marketing Evil?
After reading the article "Marketing Ethics" by Linda Ferrell:
1. Do you feel ethical guidelines make a difference to marketers?
Ethical guidelines make a difference to marketers as long as it is profitable for them. This sounds jaded and is very much a generalization. I know that some ads have a legitimate intention of just informing the public of something. A jazz club marketing team tasked with advertising upcoming acts and happy hours probably have no other ulterior evil motive. However, having worked in on-line marketing for the Seattle Times, I can say with confidence that most marketers will have no problem targeting specific people any way they possibly can. Companies can target their potential customers down to the IP address of their computers. The people who decide how, when, and where to target their preferred market have guidelines that do have to be followed though. Part of my job was to test the ads and edit for grammar, links that didn’t work, and inappropriate content. We had one advertisement for a weight loss product where if the user clicked on the “X” to clear the ad a confirmation would pop up that said something like: “By closing this ad you are indicating that you are a fat loser who doesn’t care about their health.” It was brutal and definitely not the image or message the Seattle Times wanted to convey and we removed the ad immediately. No marketing strategy can be implemented without complete understanding of its objectives and employee cooperation to make it work. (Ferrell, n.d.)

2. How can companies balance the need to win with being ethical?
If all companies adhere to the ethical guidelines then yes. Unfortunately, those companies that play fast and loose with the guidelines tend to get the upper hand.  Transparency though can be that balance. If I, the consumer, know what I’m getting into from the beginning, then I’ve entered my personal information willingly and understand the consequences. When companies use underhanded tactics like the examples of Coca-Cola and Wal-Mart to gain footing in another market it really just assumes that the consumer isn’t smart enough to make their own choices. Marketing in itself is a study of the human psyche though; ad agencies have to work miracles to make something common uncommon while convincing the public that they will become better people if they buy it. The key is whether the organization has adequately planned to mitigate the potential results of poor choices through leadership, effective ethics programs, prompt response, disciplinary actions, appropriate disclosure, communication to the workforce, and the public crisis management communication so that they do not escalate into catastrophes. (Ferrell, n.d.)
3. Is it ethical to track your buying habits or web visits to target you for marketing purposes?
No, it really isn’t. However, is it ethical to put a bunch of ads in the Sunday paper knowing that more people buy a Sunday paper than any other day? Pop-up ads and strategic ad placing on websites has become the new normal. Somehow, we’ve bought into the belief that companies that track our buying habits is actually a convenience for us. How lovely that since I ordered my face cream on Amazon yesterday that today I’m seeing ads for youthful skin and other beauty products that somehow tie back into that purchase. What if I made that purchase for my sister? The same can be said for grocery stores that have the “loyalty” cards. We get “special” discounts without coupons just because we’ve signed up for the Safeway Loyalty card and inadvertently given them access to our purchase history. Is it ethical for the websites to allow companies to do this tracking through their sites? If you open the door, isn’t whoever is standing on your doorstep going to try to come inside?
4. As a leader, how will you manage the ethical aspects of your marketing efforts?
As a leader, you have to hold people accountable, lead by example, and live the values you tout. This situation is made more dynamic because individuals are culturally diverse, have different values, and have different personal attributes, such as personality, age, and gender, which may influence how they will react in an organizational decision.  (Ferrell, n.d.) Again, I have to say that even as a leader marketing your product, whether that product is a new soft drink or data that backs up a recommendation to spend millions of dollars, transparency is essential; transparency and thorough preparation. Recently at work, a presentation was given to primarily executives and finance about three new CAMS (I think it stands for Camera Measurement Software) shoot tools. These are basically super fancy laser level/tolerance/balancing tools to make sure that when the airplane is joined together, everything lines up. It’s done before and after the join. The presentation mentioned how the tools were part of a strategy and of course it mentioned the cost. The justification for the cost was wrong though. The data given was full of false promises like they would never have to replace these tools, they never broke down, etc. Ridiculous claims that had anyone with any background at all working with these tools been present would know to be absolutely not true.  Marketing is a functional part of an organization, and ethical decision making must be coordinated with the other functional areas. Without the ability to coordinate across functional areas, key oversight and understanding will be lost. (Ferrell, n.d.) Now that the project has gotten approval and we’re moving forward on the purchase, the true capabilities are being talked about like the real maintenance and upgrade needs, possibility of downtime, and the need to always have a back-up for this downtime, etc., the people who approved the money disbursement are all in shock and feel lied to. Once we recognize that both actions and omissions shape [our] propensities for future behavior, it is apparent that slopes cannot be avoided. (LaFollette, 2007) I don’t know who was more wrong, the people over-promising or the executives who did not ask critical questions about the tools and the processes. I feel that the company who sold this amazing-never-breaks-down version of this tool marketed their product with half-truths and bloated data. I also think that the leadership involved didn’t want to admit that they needed help from the lowly mechanics to make this decision. These assumptions on my part are all conjecture since I heard about this second-hand but I’ve been in these meetings before, and I’ve been with my organization long enough to know that while most of our leadership have the very best of intentions, ego can be a problem.
References
Ferrell, L. (n.d.) Marketing ethics. University of Wyoming.
LaFollette, H. (2007). The practice of ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.

No comments:

Post a Comment